Church leaders say 'fiscal cliff' would hurt many in state
There is a popular adage that religion and politics don't mix. But state leaders of three major religious denominations clearly decided to test that theory at a recent meeting with U. S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. They told Sen. Manchin they want the president and Congress to avoid a so-called "fiscal cliff" on Jan. 1, 2013, many believe could plunge this nation into another recession.
This "People Before Politics" conference at the Blessed John XII Pastoral Center just outside the city of Charleston prompted pleas for Sen. Manchin and his colleagues in Congress to consider the impact of this national financial stalemate on the "middle and lower-income people" in West Virginia.
None of the other four members of Congress from West Virginia seem to be as interested in dialogue with their concerned constituents on this major controversy. Bishop Michael J. Bransfield, leader of the state's Catholic Diocese, reminded Manchin that "you have always been protective of West Virginia. We are counting on you."
Bishop Sandra Steiner Ball, who leads the state Conference of the United Methodist Church, circulated a statement at the meeting that predicted this so-called "fiscal cliff" will bring tax increases and spending cuts that could make West Virginia's poor residents even poorer. She said potential spending cuts will cut back on services to large numbers of adults and children in this state that already are having trouble making ends meet.
Bishop Ralph Dunkin of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America's West Virginia-Western Maryland Synod also was present for this meeting on Dec. 3.
To his credit, Manchin apologized for "the dysfunction that goes on in Washington." He said the leaders in both houses of Congress are "not leading." And when he asked for a show of hands from those in the room about the idea to disqualify senior citizens who now make 250 percent of the federal poverty level from cost-of-living adjustments in their Social Security adjustments, a few of the people in the room raised their hands.
"Everywhere I go, I find that's acceptable," Manchin said.
Social Security benefits are especially important to West Virginia residents because of the advanced age of many residents here. For more than half of this state's retired residents, their main source of income is a monthly Social Security check. Statistics released by the White House suggest about 600,000 households in West Virginia would pay higher taxes if certain current tax exemptions are allowed to expire Jan. 2.
Manchin has also made it clear that he does not support proposals in Congress to raise the retirement age for full Social Security benefits from 67 to 69. He said the only way he could vote for that move would be if there was a waiver "for the type of work you have done."
While Sen. Manchin doesn't believe Congress will allow the United States to go over the "fiscal cliff" at the start of 2013, he told this group not to expect a clean fight but instead "a bloody mess over the next few weeks."
After a 2010 report criticized the way the state's Division of Highways challenged all vehicle damage cases made against it, the DOH streamlined its process and legislative auditors reported to lawmakers recently that agency is now doing a better job of paying those claims, reducing the backlog of cases on the state Court of Claims docket.
In recent years, nearly three of every four claims filed against the state involves damage to vehicles on state-owned roads and most of them were for $2,500 or less.
The average amount claimed in these cases was $475 but auditors found that the average cost for the state to completely adjudicate one claim was $1,339.
At one point in 2008-2009, auditors found that the Court of Claims had 840 cases for amounts of less than $2,500 awaiting a small claims court hearing. This backlog resulted in lengthy court delays because DOH routinely denied every claim, forcing an automatic hearing.
The auditors' conclusion was that the practice of denying every claim saved the DOH money, but it ultimately increased the cost to state government and "placed an undue burden on the public," the report concluded. And total claims paid in 2011 did hit $8.4 million compared to $3.8 million the previous year when the system was undergoing the revised system.
Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin has so far managed to adroitly straddle the fence in the ongoing dispute between two senior lawyers in the state's Department of Health and Human Resources who have been paid at the annual rate of $96,000 a year and $83,000 a year.
But now that the two senior attorneys for the agency have been ordered back to work -- at some tasks that are not what they were doing when they were placed on leave and not allowed to work in the DHHR offices at the Capitol back in July -- it may be difficult for the governor to remain neutral in this fracas much longer. After all, he was the one who hired DHHR Acting Secretary Rocco Fucillo, who has been trying to keep this dispute under wraps.
Tom Miller is a retired state government reporter for The Herald-Dispatch. He is a regular contributor to The Herald-Dispatch opinion page.
The Herald-Dispatch welcomes your comments on this article, but please be civil. Avoid profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, accusations of criminal activity, name-calling or insults to the other posters. Herald-dispatch.com does not control or monitor comments as they are posted, but if you find a comment offensive or uncivil, hover your mouse over the comment and click the X that appears in the upper right of the comment. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal Facebook page, uncheck the box below the comment.