2018 0312 watch party sholten

Athletic Director Mike Hamrick speaks as Marshall University’s men’s basketball team hosts a watch party for the NCAA Tournament Selection Show on Sunday, March 11, 2018, at the Cam Henderson Center in Huntington, W.Va.

HUNTINGTON — When Conference USA met for its spring meetings in Destin, Florida, in late May, the atmosphere outside certainly felt like the steam of summer.

However, one of the major decisions made at those meetings will impact fall and winter more than anything.

Marshall Athletic Director Mike Hamrick confirmed that, at those meetings, the league agreed to try the “bonus play” experiment for the 2019-20 season to give the league a two-year sample into the success or failure of the process.

“We are going to do the same pod play in basketball — 1-through-5 with Pool 1 and so on,” Hamrick said. “We are going to re-evaluate it and see if that is something we want to do the following year.”

The experiment came about in late May 2018 at the 2018 C-USA spring meetings as part of the conference’s initiative to increase the number of bids into the NCAA Tournament after the league had seen success with lower-seeded teams earning victories in their opening games of the NCAA Tournament — a statistics that included No. 13 Marshall’s 81-75 win over fourth-seed Wichita State in 2018.

In the format, the conference’s 14 programs play each other once and their travel partner twice in the first seven weeks of conference play before being placed in groups, according to their won-lost record within the conference after those 14 games.

Teams are broken down into three groups — first place through fifth, sixth-10th and 11th-14th — and the final four games of conference play falls within a team’s respective grouping.

Once in a group, a team is not moved outside of its particular grouping. For example, Marshall actually finished with a better conference record than UAB following the bonus-play format, but the Thundering Herd was sixth after finishing best in Pod 2 while UAB was fifth because it was the final team in Pod 1.

The goal of the bonus-play scheduling is to have Conference USA’s best teams playing each other at the end of the regular season, which could help with NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET)  rankings at the end of the year — a ranking that goes a long way toward determining postseason selection in the NCAA and NIT tournaments.

Conceptually, if a team dominates Conference USA play, but gets upset in the C-USA Tournament at season’s end, the league would have a better chance at multiple bids for the NCAA Tournament.

“The pod scheduling is based on having two or three really good teams who are in the 30s, 40s or 50s in NET rankings,” Hamrick said. “Those teams in the top pod have to be really good and one has to jump out, so if they lose the tournament, they still have something to get in.”

Hamrick contends, however, that the concept didn’t work last season in part for two reasons: one, C-USA did not have an elite-level team that was in the upper echelon of the NET rankings as desired and, two, the teams situated in Pod 1 (seeds 1-5 in league) all went 2-2 in pod play.

Essentially, the system works if Conference USA has an elite upper-third of the league that separates from everyone else. However, if there is parity in the league, it actually could hinder the league’s ability to advance.

“It didn’t help this year,” Hamrick said. “Our top team wasn’t high enough to help it work, plus I think the top team went 2-2 in pool play. You have to go 4-0. That was one of the concerns when it came about.”

Old Dominion ended up as the 2018-19 Conference USA champion, but had just a 13-5 league record (including 2-2 in pod play) and was around 100 in the NET rankings prior to Selection Sunday.

The result was the Monarchs drawing a No. 14 seed in the NCAA Tournament, which earned them a date against No. 3 Purdue, which defeated ODU, 61-48.

One major reason why the bonus-play format was doomed even before league play started was because of the collective league record in non-conference play.

In all, Conference USA teams went 76-73 overall, which is just a 51 percent non-conference winning percentage.

“That needs to get better, and we’re working to get it better,” Hamrick said.

Furthermore, Hamrick said league officials have also spoken of trying the bonus-play format on the women’s side in Conference USA, as well, which could take effect for the 2019-20 season, if finalized.

“We’re looking at the possibility of changing the women’s format to some kind of pod, but that is also still being worked out,” Hamrick said.

After the 2019-20 season, officials will return to the 2020 spring meetings and evaluate the two-year success or failure rate of the format and decide what is the best proposal for men’s and women’s basketball moving forward.

“I’m curious to do it one more year and to really re-evaluate it,” Hamrick said.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.