HUNTINGTON — Spring is in the air in Huntington, and soon, new flowers will be in pots around the city.
Huntington in Bloom is returning for another year to beautify downtown. Planting will begin in mid-May, with fall flowers and decor appearing in mid-October, said Lisa Riley, assistant director of the Huntington Municipal Development Authority.
Flowers will be planted throughout Huntington. One hundred twenty pots will be on display along 3rd, 4th and 5th avenues, from 8th to 10th streets, and in Pullman Square. Locations such as Harris Riverfront Park and City Hall will have ground plantings. Along 3rd and 4th avenues and 8th Street, there will be 140 hanging plants. Window boxes in the garage on 3rd Avenue and 8th Street are on the list to be filled with flowers.
This year’s color theme is hot pink, purple, white and yellow. Flower types will be petunias, angelonia, sweet potato vines, zinnias, dracaena indivisa and banana plants. The hanging pots will be bubblegum pink supertunias.
Huntington in Bloom partners with local greenhouses, such as Bob’s Market and Greenhouse, White’s Woodland Nursery, Floyd’s Fruits and Flowers and Kim’s Greenhouse, to get plants for the Adopt-a-Pot fundraiser.
As part of the annual fundraiser, donors can opt to buy one pot of flowers for $100 or two for $150. The latter choice is a new option and honors the city of Huntington’s 150th birthday celebration. To further commemorate the occasion, new banners created by Bullseye Total Media were installed on 3rd and 4th avenues to highlight the anniversary.
Riley said the flower pots will come with a sign that can be inscribed with something, like a business name or to honor someone’s memory. The deadline to adopt a pot is April 30, but Huntington in Bloom accepts donations year-round.
The watering season for the program was expanded this year to May 11 through Nov. 1. For the third year in a row, Huntington in Bloom is partnering with Goodwill Industries to water plants throughout the year.
Huntington in Bloom is a fund of the Foundation for the Tri-State Community. According to its website, the foundation’s mission is to improve the quality of life in the region.
Huntington in Bloom is a four-season beautification effort, Riley said. Recently, the city of Huntington and the Huntington Municipal Development Authority donated $20,000 each to the program, for a total of $40,000.
In some ways, Huntington in Bloom has a new meaning this year, Riley said. In the past year, many have hunkered down in their homes to avoid the coronavirus. Now, as vaccines become more available, people are looking forward to spending time outside and gathering with others. The flowers can add to that atmosphere in downtown Huntington.
“As businesses have reopened and the beautiful spring weather has arrived, I believe people are feeling a sense of hope after a very long year,” Riley said. “We believe the flowers and other beautification efforts will contribute to an inviting atmosphere as our downtown welcomes both residents and visitors to eat, shop and play.”
Last year, the beautification group did not use volunteers because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Riley said this year, the program has contracted professional landscapers and has partnered with a few longtime supporters who have been fully vaccinated to plant flowers.
Huntington in Bloom hopes to reopen for volunteers this fall, but it will depend on what Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines are at that time, Riley said.
To adopt a flower pot or make a donation, visit www.huntingtoninbloom.org. Checks, with “HIB Adopt a Pot” in the memo line, can be mailed to Foundation for the Tri-State Community at P.O. Box 2096, Ashland, KY 41105.
Congress has poured tens of billions of dollars into state and local public health departments in response to the coronavirus pandemic, paying for masks, contact tracers and education campaigns to persuade people to get vaccinated.
Public health officials who have juggled bare-bones budgets for years are happy to have the additional money. Yet they worry it will soon dry up as the pandemic recedes, continuing a boom-bust funding cycle that has plagued the U.S. public health system for decades. If budgets are slashed again, they warn, that could leave the nation where it was before the coronavirus: unprepared for a health crisis.
“We need funds that we can depend on year after year,” said Dr. Mysheika Roberts, the health commissioner of Columbus, Ohio.
When Roberts started in Columbus in 2006, an emergency preparedness grant paid for more than 20 staffers. By the time the coronavirus pandemic hit, it paid for about 10.
Relief money that came through last year helped the department staff up its coronavirus response teams. While the funding has helped the city cope with the immediate crisis, Roberts wonders if history will repeat itself.
After the pandemic is over, public health officials across the U.S. fear, they’ll be back to scraping together money from a patchwork of sources to provide basic services to their communities — much like after the Sept. 11 attacks and the SARS and Ebola outbreaks.
When the mosquito-borne Zika virus tore through South America in 2016, causing serious birth defects in newborn babies, members of Congress couldn’t agree how, and how much, to spend in the U.S. for prevention efforts, such as education and mosquito abatement. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention took money from its Ebola efforts, and from state and local health department funding, to pay for the initial Zika response. Congress eventually allocated $1.1 billion for Zika, but by then, mosquito season had passed in much of the U.S.
“Something happens, we throw a ton of money at it, and then in a year or two we go back to our shrunken budgets and we can’t do the minimum things we have to do day in and day out, let alone be prepared for the next emergency,” said Chrissie Juliano, executive director of the Big Cities Health Coalition, which represents leaders of more than two dozen public health departments.
Funding for Public Health Emergency Preparedness, which pays for emergency capabilities for state and local health departments, dropped by about half between the 2003 and 2021 fiscal years, accounting for inflation, according to Trust for America’s Health, a public health research and advocacy organization.
Even the federal Prevention and Public Health Fund, which was established with the Affordable Care Act to provide $2 billion a year for public health, was raided for cash over the past decade. If the money hadn’t been touched, eventually local and state health departments would have gotten an additional $12.4 billion.
Several lawmakers, led by Democratic U.S. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, are looking to end the boom-bust cycle with legislation that would eventually provide $4.5 billion annually in core public health funding. Health departments carry out essential government functions — such as managing water safety, issuing death certificates, tracking sexually transmitted diseases and preparing for infectious outbreaks.
Spending for state public health departments dropped by 16% per capita from 2010 to 2019, and spending for local health departments fell by 18%, KHN and The Associated Press found in a July investigation. At least 38,000 public health jobs were lost at the state and local level between the 2008 recession and 2019. Today, many public health workers are hired on a temporary or part-time basis. Some are paid so poorly they qualify for public aid. Those factors reduce departments’ ability to retain people with expertise.
Compounding those losses, the coronavirus pandemic has prompted an exodus of public health officials because of harassment, political pressure and exhaustion. A yearlong analysis by the AP and KHN found at least 248 leaders of state and local health departments resigned, retired or were fired between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Nearly 1 in 6 Americans lost a local public health leader during the pandemic. Experts say it is the largest exodus of public health leaders in American history.
Brian Castrucci, CEO of the de Beaumont Foundation, which advocates for public health, calls Congress’ giant influx of cash in response to the crisis “wallpaper and drapes” because it doesn’t restore public health’s crumbling foundation.
“I worry at the end of this we’re going to hire up a bunch of contact tracers — and then lay them off soon thereafter,” Castrucci said. “We are continuing to kind of go from disaster to disaster without ever talking about the actual infrastructure.”
Castrucci and others say they need dependable money for high-skill professionals, such as epidemiologists — data-driven disease detectives — and for technology upgrades that would help track outbreaks and get information to the public.
In Ohio, the computer system used to report cases to the state predates the invention of the iPhone. State officials had said for years they wanted to upgrade it, but they lacked the money and the political will. Many departments across the country have relied on fax machines to report COVID-19 cases.
During the pandemic, Ohio’s state auditor found that nearly 96% of local health departments it surveyed had problems with the state’s disease reporting system. Roberts said workers interviewing patients had to navigate several pages of questions, a major burden when handling 500 cases daily.
The system was so outdated that some information could be entered only in a non-searchable comment box, and officials struggled to pull data from the system to report to the public — such as how many people who tested positive had attended a Black Lives Matter rally, which last summer was a key question for people trying to understand whether protests contributed to the virus’s spread.
Ohio is working on a new system, but Roberts worries that, without a dependable budget, the state won’t be able to keep that one up to date either.
“You’re going to need to upgrade that,” Roberts said. “And you’re going to need dollars to support that.”
In Washington, the public health director for Seattle and King County, Patty Hayes, said she is asked all the time why there isn’t a central place to register for a vaccine appointment. The answer comes down to money: Years of underfunding left departments across the state with antiquated computer systems that were not up to the task when the coronavirus hit.
Hayes recalls a time when her department would conduct mass vaccination drills, but that system was dismantled when the money dried up after the specter of Sept. 11 faded.
Roughly six years ago, an analysis found that her department was about $25 million short of what it needed annually for core public health work. Hayes said the past year has shown that’s an underestimate. For example, climate change is prompting more public health concerns, such as the effect on residents when wildfire smoke engulfed much of the Pacific Northwest in September.
Public health officials in some areas may struggle to make the case for more stable funding because a large swath of the public has questioned — and often been openly hostile toward — the mask mandates and business restrictions that public health officials have imposed through the pandemic.
In Missouri, some county commissioners who were frustrated at public health restrictions withheld money from the departments.
In Knox County, Tennessee, Mayor Glenn Jacobs narrated a video posted in the fall that showed a photo of health officials after referencing “sinister forces.” Later, someone spray-painted “DEATH” on the department office building. The Board of Health was stripped of its powers in March and was given an advisory role. A spokesperson for the mayor’s office declined to comment on the video.
“This is going to change the position of public health and what we can and cannot do across the country,” said Dr. Martha Buchanan, the head of the health department. “I know it’s going to change it here.”
A KHN and AP investigation in December found at least 24 states were crafting legislation that would limit or remove public health powers.
Back in Seattle, locally based companies have pitched in money and staff members for vaccine sites. Microsoft is hosting one location, while Starbucks offered customer service expertise to help design them. Hayes is grateful, but she wonders why a critical government function didn’t have the resources it needed during a pandemic.
If public health had been getting dependable funding, her staff could have been working more effectively with the data and preparing for emerging threats in the state where the first U.S. COVID-19 case was confirmed.
“They’ll look back at this response to the pandemic in this country as a great example of a failure of a country to prioritize the health of its citizens, because it didn’t commit to public health,” she said. “That will be part of the story.”
HUNTINGTON — The Cabell County Board of Education ratified reduction-in-force and transfer notices for 140 county professional and service employees Tuesday, but remain hopeful that those individuals will find jobs in the school system by the start of the next school year.
Reduction-in-force (RIF) policy is common in many workplaces, particularly in education, and involve employees being removed from their positions, often due to lack of funding or reorganization.
It’s become a common occurrence for school districts across West Virginia, as RIFs are generally the product of the loss of state funding generated by shrinking enrollment.
Once an employee receives a RIF notice, they may bid on new job postings listed by the county prior to the next school year’s start, with preferred call-back granted to RIF recipients.
Student enrollment in Cabell County decreased by 251 from last year to this year, Superintendent Ryan Saxe said, leading to a loss of federal and state funds.
“These personnel decisions are always a difficult situation, but the good thing is that I think we’ll be able to get through that and get everybody rehired before next school year,” Saxe told The Herald-Dispatch.
Tuesday’s decision affects 50 professional and 27 service employees who received RIF notices and 46 professional and 17 service employees who received notice of a transfer from their current position to a subsequent assignment.
Transferred employees remain at their current salary schedule and employment terms unless otherwise noted. Two individuals, Bret Masters and Brenda Scott, were removed from consideration for transfer after a 4-1 vote by board members. That decision came after both individuals had hearings related to their transfers Tuesday. Skip Parsons was the lone board member opposed.
In other business, board members heard a presentation on the proposed boundary changes for the 2021-22 school year that would shift enrollment at 19 schools across the district by the 2023-24 academic year.
The two schools most affected by the current redistricting proposal are Village of Barboursville and Davis Creek elementary schools. Village of Barboursville Elementary is 10 students under the enrollment capacity of 643 students. In 2021-22, a total of 78 students would be moved from Village of Barboursville Elementary to three other schools, with an additional 111 students being moved from Village of Barboursville Elementary to the new Davis Creek Elementary in 2023-24, reducing Village of Barboursville’s total enrollment to 444 students and increasing Davis Creek’s by 93.
Members of the public can view the proposed boundary changes and how they would change enrollment in each school on the Cabell County Schools website, where they can also complete a survey and provide feedback on the proposed plan.
Two community open houses are scheduled for Monday, May 3, and Thursday, May 6, at Huntington High School and Cabell Midland High School, respectively, from 6 to 8 p.m.