Essential reporting in volatile times.

Click here to stay informed and subscribe to Herald-Dispatch.

Click #isupportlocal for more information on supporting our local journalists.


Learn more about HD Media

The following editorial appeared on Bloomberg Opinion:

Citigroup has made headlines for becoming the first big Wall Street bank to name a woman as chief executive officer. Jane Fraser, Citigroup’s president, will take over from CEO Michael Corbat in February. Laudable as the choice may be, one can’t help but wonder: What took so long?

For years, mounting evidence has suggested that companies with women in top jobs perform better.

A 2015 study by U.C. Davis found that the 25 California public companies with the largest share of female directors and highly paid executives delivered a median return on assets more than double that of the state’s 400 largest public firms. A 2016 study by the Petersen Institute for International Economics, looking at almost 22,000 firms from 91 countries, also concluded that women in charge means “unusually strong performance.”

Why don’t supposedly profit-seeking companies already have more women in their C-suites? They’ve been moving in that direction — but too slowly. In 2019, women still accounted for just 19% of top executives and 5% of CEOs at companies in the S&P 500 Index, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The six biggest Wall Street banks actually had a somewhat better 28% female representation in their executive ranks.

It’s clear that women still face far too many obstacles — from toxic work environments (notably on Wall Street), to family leave policies and the aggregate effect of numerous smaller barriers. Aside from being morally wrong, these inequities hold back the entire economy, undermining both innovation and productivity.

For the sake of their shareholders, as well as merely doing the right thing, companies should try harder. A recent study by Ernst & Young, for example, found that about half of the largest U.S. publicly traded companies mentioned their commitment to a diverse workforce in their disclosures to investors, but less than a third of those provided any numbers to demonstrate their progress. Standardized measures are readily available. The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, for example, has developed metrics that enterprises such as Nike already use to track diversity at all levels of seniority. (Bloomberg LP is a founding partner of the SASB, and Bloomberg Philanthropies has provided financial support.) The Securities and Exchange Commission should consider making such disclosures mandatory for public companies, as its investor advisory committee has recommended.

Making the executive team look more like the broader workforce redresses injustice and helps the economy. Companies should set that goal and achieve it.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.